'/>
Showing newest posts with label Lactivism. Show older posts
Showing newest posts with label Lactivism. Show older posts

Friday, April 16, 2010

Cycling For Women, Our Boobs & Babes

On Saturday April 24 Northern Territory midwife Marg Phelan sets off on a year long bike ride around Australia for women, babies, birth and breastfeeding. According to the endeavours' webpage:
"Marg Phelan is combining her life's passions to spread the word that women have a right to choose where and with whom they give birth, and to be properly supported in these choices.

Marg's aim is to educate Australian women of all ages, locations, lifestyles and circumstances about the benefits of care from a known and trusted midwife and the importance of good support"
The site also states: "Go Girl Australia is a not-for-profit venture that aims to promote continuity of care from a known midwife, normal birth and breastfeeding."

For more information check out Go Girl's website and find out about sponsorship opportunities.

See also: Darwin Homebirth Group.

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Why We Shouldn't Use The "F" Word

Vs

Those of us committed to improving breastfeeding rates worldwide need to stop using The "F" word. It's fine (and sometimes absolutely necessary) to drop a "fuck" or "fucking" into our conversations about promotion of artificial feeding and related topics, because that "F" word is great for expressing our rage and frustration. And we need a feminist framework to help understand the patriarchal factors which contribute to widespread lactophobia. These "F" words are F-F-F-Fine. The truly abhorrent "F" word that has got to go is "formula"!

Artificial breastmilk is not "formula", despite the commonly used lingo. Formula is a word with positive connotations in Western society. It is associated with fast cars, scientific advancement, cunning strategy (think "formula for success"). By the simple act of using The "F" Word we are subtly promoting artificial feeding over breastfeeding in our everyday conversations!

One of the most famous formulas is "E=MC2". Artificial milk pushing companies know this and use this to their advantage, creating an association between their product, which they call "formula" and "Einstein", the Western world's best known genius. Sadly, however, children who are artificially fed end up with lower IQs than breastfed children (see here and here).

Artificial feeding is no formula for success and is certainly not the smart or technological advanced way to feed a child. Artificial feeding is greatly inferior to breastfeeding! Artificial feeding is associated with greater incidents of gastroenteritis, childhood cancers, obesity, multiple sclerosis, otitis media, osteoporosis, diabetes and hospitalisation for respiratory infections (to name just a few dangers of ABM).*

So-called "formula" is no substitute for breast milk, as the Australian Breastfeeding Association's Counselor Manual says (Section D.70.27):
"When we have a substitute on a playing field we take off one player and replace with another player of equal value and the game continues. Artificial baby milk is not a breastmilk substitute. It is a greatly inferior product. Breastfeeding is not special. Special indicates something extra or harder work, not everyday or normal. Breastfeeding is everyday and needs to be incorporated into the everyday rather than seen as an extra."

Refusing to use the "F" word is one very simple way lactivists can make a stand against the marketing of artificial breastmilk. Instead, by saying "artificial breastmilk" we put breastfeeding front and centre again, highlighting that it is the man-made powder that comes in cans which is abnormal and inferior.


Bookmark and Share

For more on langauge and breastfeeding see Watch Your Language! By Diane Wiessinger, MS, IBCLC (Reprinted from the Journal of Human Lactation, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1996)

Related Ilithyia Inspired pages:

Artificial Milk: Voldermort of Baby Feeding

Why is the Health of Babies Less Important?

See also:
Artificial Feeding – Nothing To Do With Breastfeeding

Consumer Research on Infant Formual and Infant Feeding

Formula for Disaster

Genetic Engineering and Infant Foods

Hot Milk - The Unbottled Truth About Formula

IBFAN

International Breastfeeding Journal

Just One Bottle

Misinformation: Redefining Baby Feeding

Myths

Suck on This

Toxic Phthalates in Infant Formulas


The Case of The Virgin Gut

The Language of Breastfeeding

The Risks of Infant Formula Feeding

What Should I Know About Infant Formula

Yes! Just One Bottle Will Hurt!


*Information concerning the dangers of artificial feeding and consequences to health were found in Jan Riordan's Breastfeeding and Human Lactation, Third Edition, see in particular pages 114-117.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Breastfeeding & Healing From Sexual Abuse

Today I read this post at Motherwear Breastfeeding Blog about breastfeeding and sexual abuse, which links to the site of Penny Simkin, a doula who has written a book about childbirth for survivors of sexual abuse. I also discovered Penny's writing about sexual abuse survivors during the postpartum period, in which she writes that one of the possible impacts past sexual absue can have on a woman during the postpartum period is "revulsion with sexual implications of breastfeeding".

Below is my journey with healing from sexual abuse and it's relevance to my experience of the breastfeeding relationship. I will include some more online resources about breastfeeding and sexual abuse at the end of this post....

When I was nineteen weeks pregnant with my daughter my breasts began leaking colostrum and at that moment, at twenty-four years of age, I discovered that I had breasts. Prior to that moment I had lived in denial about my womanly bust, ignoring it because to think, see, or touch them was to acknowledge the sexual abuse I survived as teenager.

My abuser had a particular fascination with my breasts and the more his interest grew the more I pretended they weren't there. Until I was twenty-five I never wore a bra that fitted me correctly or supported my large breasts. I stuffed them into smaller bras, at the time not realising this was what I was doing, because I could not allow myself to recognise their blossoming size.

I might have lived in this denial and carried the hand prints of my abuser on my breasts my whole life, had I not decided to have a child and read extensively about raising healthy children prior to becoming pregnant.

My daughter and I have been breastfeeding for almost 14 months. There have been challenges throughout that time, but none greater than being confronted by the sexual abuse of my past.

Sometimes her suckling at my breast, or tweaking the nipple on the other breast while feeding (which is one of her methods for prompting milk production in that breast) causes me to have flash backs and I confused her presence at my breasts with his; the abuser. There have been moments when I have cried and begged her to stop, feeling the fear and shame from a decade ago. But she doesn't stop, of course, because she knows that her life depends upon my breasts and I don't force her to stop because I am her mother and accept my responsibility to do right by her and meet her basic human needs.

I seek help to heal from the abuse, because that is the real problem, not breastfeeding. Why should I let a pervert from my past abuse my daughter through me by denying her what is her birthright?

Were it not for breastfeeding I would not have sought help. It is so easy for women to mistreat themselves as others have done and to continue abusing themselves long after their abusers are gone. Breastfeeding has brought an end to this for me, because with a hungry baby to care for, it's not just about me anymore.

A friend of mine sent me a link to an article by Kate Joester, another feminist mother who discovered the healing power of breastfeeding. Like me, this woman survived the sexual abuse of her breasts and like me she discovered the power of reclaiming her breasts through breastfeeding:

"The first thing I did for my children as babies was provide for them, all by myself. Physically, I had it in me to give them all they needed. I hate that so many women don’t believe that of themselves and bemused that handing that capacity over to someone else is seen by some as liberating...After 28 years in a culture where women’s bodies belong to pretty much anyone but them, it was only my children that showed me that my body, even mine, belongs to me to give." (Emphasis added).

As I read that exert I was struck by how easy it would have been to quit breastfeeding and tell myself I was free. Free from the pain and free from the flashbacks. And what a great reason I would have had to justify my "choice" not to breastfeed! I could have said defensively to breastfeeding mothers: "It's great that you can breastfeed, but you didn't have my problems."

There I could have sat, fattening my child up on artificial milk that increases the liklihood of her developing all kinds of allergies and diseases and other health problems later in life (that would have forced her into an unnaturally deep sleep because her body simply couldn't cope with the massive task of breaking down and digesting all those artificial chemicals while awake). All the while my breasts safely hidden away in a bra that doesn't fit, still securely the property of a sexual predator I once knew.

Related Resources

Beyond The Abuse: breastfeeding after sexual violation by Gwen Morrison

Breastfeeding After Sexual Abuse by Le Leche League

Breastfeeding and The Sexual Abuse Survivor by Penny Simkin

Breastfeeding as a Survivor of Sexual Abuse by Morgan Gallagher

Breastfeeding: radical, feminist and good for you by Kate Joester

The Long Shadow: adult survivors of childhood abuse by Kathleen Kendall-Tackett, Ph.D., IBCLC
More links here at Breastfeeding Made Simple

Note: I really can't thank my lactivist friends enough for their genuine support throughout my journey.

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Breastfeeding Advocacy Images

I made the following breastfeeding advocacy images today during some free time.
















Feel free to copy and share on your own blog or website.

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Artificial Infant Milk: Voldermort of Baby Feeding!

An article in today's Age by Leo Shanahan finally dares to ask the question; why isn't artificial infant milk named for the risks it poses to human health?:

"FORMULA feeding is not being described as a health risk to children because researchers are too scared to do so, according to Australian National University academics.

A new paper from the Centre for Economics Research on Health argues that despite weighty evidence that breast-fed children are less likely to suffer from type 1 diabetes, allergies, infections, die of infant death syndrome or develop certain cancers, researchers are not willing to name formula as a danger in the titles or summaries of studies [note from sarah@ilithyia inspired: this should read "weighty evidence that children fed artificial milk are more likely to suffer from type 1 diabetes, allergies, infections, die of infant death syndrome or develop certain cancers"].

The report's author, Dr Julie Smith, compared the fear to naming formula to the way the evil overlord Voldemort is treated in the Harry Potter novels.

"We looked at the findings of nearly 80 authoritative studies, all of which highlighted that formula-fed babies tend to be at higher risk of poor health than children fed on breast milk," she said.

"Yet the vast majority of these studies did not mention formula feeding in the places that matter most for lasting impressions: headlines and abstracts.

"Rather than naming formula feeding as a significant risk factor, researchers seem to be treating this subject like Voldemort in the Harry Potter novels, as He Who Shall Not Be Named," Dr Smith said.

Dr Smith said despite American Academy of Pediatrics citing stating that breast feeding should always be used over bottle feeding where possible, mothers and doctors were left confused by studies that associated breastfeeding not formula with health problems..."


Why aren't the dangers of artificial infant milk being named openly? Because the companies who profit from the consumption of artificial milk have done a fantastic job of marketing their product for decades! They've got it to a point where the consumers they have won do most of their marketing for them. We live in a culture of "don't say anything bad about artificial feeding or you'll make a mother feel guilty". As with any war, truth was the first causality of the war between artificial milk and breastfeeding.

What upsets me far more than this, is that even some breastfeeding advocates refuse to participate in this war, often prioritising "being nice" (to the large coprorations that make money from selling a product that is inferior, poses health risks and is completely unnecessary in a world full of lactating breasts!) over their advocacy and support of other women! Every time breastfeeding makes it into the media some breastfeeding advocate feels the need to say "but if you can't breastfeed, that's okay". The decision to play nice and preface their advocacy for breastfeeding with mentions of not breastfeeding also help those big companies market their powder.

This is unacceptable. Families should know the truth about artificial milk because none of them are making informed choices otherwise. Feeding your child artificial milk is HIGHLY inferior to breastfeeding. Artificial milk does pose helath risks - it is man made and with that comes a lot of risks of human error and contamination. This is not to mention the fact that by breastfeeding you decrease many health risks that otherwise might have been posed to mother and baby!

The health of babies and young children should be the number one priority, it should be prioritiesed over and above not offending other adults and it should definitely be prioritised over being nice to large coporations!

You can read the whole article from The Age here.


Skin to Skin!
Plastic to Plastic


Bookmark and Share


For information about the importance of breastfeeding and dangers of artificial breast milk read:

Bottle Feeding


101 Reasons to Breastfeed Your Child

Artificial Feeding – Nothing To Do With Breastfeeding

Consumer Research on Infant Formual and Infant Feeding

Formula for Disaster

Genetic Engineering and Infant Foods

Hot Milk - The Unbottled Truth About Formula

IBFAN

International Breastfeeding Journal

Just One Bottle

Misinformation: Redefining Baby Feeding

Myths

Suck on This

Toxic Phthalates in Infant Formulas


The Case of The Virgin Gut

The Language of Breastfeeding

The Risks of Infant Formula Feeding

What Should I Know About Infant Formula

Yes! Just One Bottle Will Hurt!

Saturday, February 7, 2009

Breast Cake



In honour of our daughters first birthdays one of my friends and I decided to decorate the birthday cakes to look like a pair of breasts. This is very fitting given our girls have spent much of the first year suckling at our breasts.

The cake itself is your average butter cake (in fact we used a packet mix for our test run). To make it look like a breast all we needed was:
  • Icing sugar
  • Warm water
  • 1 raspberry lolly
  • A round ended knife (or something similar)
  • Pink food dye
  • Yellow food dye
  • Piping bag and nozzle
We used a home brand butter cake mix to make the actual cake. Then icing sugar and water to get the right consistency for the icing.

To create a satisfactory colour scheme we used just a couple of drops of pink food dye mixed in with the icing sugar and water. Once it was mixed in we realised it looked like the colour of a cartoon character's breast rather than a human breast. We added one drop of yellow food dye to create a realistic flesh tone. We left the icing to set before adding the nipple and arela.



To make the decorative nipple appear more realistic we placed a raspberry lolly on top of the iced cake.

We created a separate batch of icing to ice the nipple and areola of our breast cake. We made this icing thicker than the first batch.

For the nipple and areola colour we used more pink food dye to make it darker than the rest of the breast. This time we added two drops of yellow food dye.

Once this icing was made we put it into a piping bag and carefully squeezed it out on top of the rasperry lolly. Then we iced a circle around the lolly to create an areola.



Finally we used a round ended knife that had been dipped in warm water to gently smooth out any lumps or bumps in the icing.






To give the cakes a more fleshy colour add more yellow food dye and flour to lighten. To make the tones darker add cocoa:




Bookmark and Share

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Valentine's Day, Love & Breast Milk

My daughter's first birthday is rapidly approaching. Her birthday of course also marks the first anniversary of our breastfeeding journey. To celebrate the occassion I have put together the following montage:


If you would like to copy the codes and post this montage on your own blog or website please leave a comment here requesting permission.

Bookmark and Share

Peace, love and breast milk, Sarah.

Monday, January 26, 2009

"When Breastfeeding Is Accepted, It Won't Be Noticed"

Marin Breastfeeding Coaltion in California have launched a campaign promoting acceptance of public breastfeeding by placing life-sized photographs of mothers and babies feeding around their local area. An article on NBC Bay Area reports:

“During a recent test run in San Rafael, the cutouts drew dozens of gawking eyes and confused second looks. Each cut-out figure is holding a card which reads, “When breastfeeding is accepted, it won’t be noticed.”

The Marin Breastfeeding Coalition said it would love for everyone to notice the campaign and to question why they were even paying so much attention to a breastfeeding mother in the first place.

The group wants the public to know that breastfeeding in public is perfectly acceptable and that it is actually protected by law."



Read the full article, complete with pictures of the artworks, here.


Bookmark and Share

Thursday, January 8, 2009

A Very Personal Gift

Last Christmas I gave someone the greatest gift I've ever given anyone. A gift that; boosts the immune system, protects children from sudden infant death syndrome, lowers a child's risk of developing asthma, diabetes, and food allergies later in life, and is great for bones, skin and teeth, to name just a few awesome facts about this gift: my breast milk.

Jay lives over 1370 kilometres from me. We met through an online homebirth community. When I was preparing for the birth of my child I drew a lot of strength and inspiration from her. I was anxious about the breastfeeding journey that lay ahead of me, but Jay had graciously shared her breastfeeding story online and she made me realise that with determination (and support) anyone could breastfeed.

During her third pregnancy Jay was diagnosed with hypoplastic breasts. This meant her breasts had underdeveloped milk glands, as the 007B website explains: "they simply don't have enough milk producing cells", which can lead to milk supply issues. If she wanted to exclusively breastfeed her child she would need the help of other lactating mothers.

To ensure that she gave her baby the best start to life and protected him from the dangerous health risks of artificial breast milk (ABM) Jay created a community of breast milk donors in her community. Jay adhered to the World Health Organisation’s recommendations that ABM should only be considered once the possibility of breast milk donations has been attempted.

As the holiday season was approaching Jay became concerned about the amount of frozen expressed breast milk (EBM) in her freezer and the availability of her donors during Christmas and The New Year. She appealed to the online homebirth community I belong to for more donors.

I learned that EBM could be packed with dry ice and sent around the world which meant I could possibly donate my milk to Jay. I replied to her request and said she could have all the milk I could express as soon as I figured out how to send it across the country. Thankfully others saw my response and before we knew it Jay had donors in Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth and regional areas too! Like the other donors, I just had to get a blood test to make sure I had no diseases that might pass into my milk and onto Jay's baby.

I kept my breast pump handy. Whenever I was feeling relaxed I would put it to my breast and start squeezing the handle. Before this I had only expressed to relieve engorgement or to get 5 to 10mls worth of milk to relive my child's conjunctivitis, blocked ears or runny nose (which I administered using a dropper). I found it painful and laborious.

Like birth, breastfeeding causes the mother's body to release oxytocin, a hormone which causes ejection reflexes such as the foetal ejection reflex that occurs during second stage labour, the ejection reflex women can sometimes experience during orgasm and of course the breasts' milk ejection reflex (or “let down”). But for oxytocin levels to rise enough to cause these ejections a woman must have a relaxed environment where she feels safe. Knowing this, whenever I sat down to pump for Jay and her baby I would try to get into the right frame of mind.

Other milk donor mums let me in on their secrets to successful expressing. These tips included pumping first thing in the morning and while your baby suckled at the other breast. Both tips helped a lot. Something else that helped was my own child's growing interest in the world beyond my bust. When in the company of others she became too excited to want to be still and feed, so the stretches between feeds over the holiday season became longer, and the milk was eager to flow when I pumped.

I discovered that trying to reach a certain numerical goal of EBM can threaten breastfeeding confidence. Watching my milk slowly drip into the pump made it seem like so little milk is made. Of course a baby is much more efficient at suckling milk from a breast and mother and baby's bodies work together to create optimum conditions for let-down, very different to pumping breast tissue with a piece of plastic. Still, there were times during when I thought to myself "oh my God, does my baby get any milk out of me?", "what's wrong with my breasts?", "all that work for so little payoff!" The flip side was looking at a jar full of milk that I made, which was very affirming. The thrill of fill a jar was fun.

I got to witness the magic of fore and hind breast milk. At the beginning of a feed breast milk is clear and watery. This is ideal for when the child needs to quench thirst but isn't up for a big meal. As the child stays at the breast the breast begins to let down thicker, white, fatty milk known as the hind milk. This is a gradual change from the clear to white milk (sort of like the same graduation from cold to hot water when turning on the hot tap at a kitchen sink). When first expressed all the milk blends in together, but when left in the fridge in a jar, undisturbed, it begins to separate. The thick white hind milk sits at the top, like skin forming on a soup, and the watery fore milk stays below.

Everytime I added more milk to my jar I swirled it around so that the fore and hind milk mixed together. I did this because otherwise the hind milk would stick stubbornly to the sides of the jar, and I didn't want that important milk to stay on my jar when it could be making it to a baby's tummy!

The jar I stored my milk in was an old mustard jar which had been sterilised. At the end of a sitting with my pump I emptied my expressed gold into the old mustard jar and kept it cool at the back of the fridge. Here it would keep for three days (ABA - Expressing and Storing Breast Milk). When the jar was full or close to full (or when the milk had been in the fridge for two days) I would pour the milk into a zip lock bag, seal it and place it in my freezer. Before using the zip lock bag I would label it with my name, the date the milk was expressed and the date it was frozen (sometime I would leave personal messages to Jay on the bags too, which made her smile months down the track). In my freezer the milk was safe for Jay's baby for three months if need be (ABA - Expressing and Storing Breast Milk).

Pumping for Jay on Christmas morning

Jay arranged to have a courier pack an esky with my frozen EBM & party ice (as it turned out dry ice was not safe for couriering) and fly the esky to her. This was no cheap feat! But such was Jay’s commitment to ensuring her son received breast milk.



I had wondered what a delivery man might think about border-hopping breast milk. But this was no ordinary delivery man. He and his wife felt it was an honour to be delivering something so precious from one family to another. As he packed the esky we talked about the wonder of breast milk, the potential for his wife to relactate and continue feeding their weaned two year old, and the amazing situation we found ourselves in thanks to Jay and her son. We both took photos of our special delivery before I farewelled my milk.

The following morning I received an email from Jay thanking me for the gift. The milk had arrived safely. We arranged a second courier date for March*. After that her son would be eating more solid foods and could get enough milk from Jay’s breasts alone. Thanks to Jay and her precious babe for giving us such a wondrous honour. There is nothing quite like the feeling of knowing I was able to give you a gift that can do so much for the heatlh and well-being of another person. I look forward to our little milk sibling children meeting one another in the future.


*In total I donated over 5 and a half litres of breast milk to Jay and her son, which flew (frozen) from Melbourne to Brisbane during the warmest months of the year.



Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Why is the Health of Babies Less Important?

After an unfriendly encounter with an artificial breastmilk (also known as formula) pusher in a department store it occured to me that the health of babies simply does not rate as important as the health of adults and older children. I have no doubt everyone in this society would deny such a claim, but when we consider social attitudes and behaviour concerning health issues such as breastfeeding and birth it is undeniable.

Yesterday I discovered a local store had two large promotional displays of artificial breast milk (ABM) assembeled in their baby section. This is a violation of the World Health Organisation's code about advertising ABM. The World Health Organisation is very clear on the improtance of breastfeeding to the health of all babies (See "The World Health Organisation Says" section in the right hand sidebar of this site). In addition to WHOs 'stance, many scientific studies attest to the superiority of breast milk compared to ABM, and indeed give cause for great concern about the dangers ABM poses to the health and well being of babies (in the short and long term).


I gave the store the benefit of the doubt and assumed that the store manager was not aware of the violation or of their responsibility to promote good health for babies. I politely approached her about the issue to let her know. She was immediately rude and defensive and wanted to argue with me and make the issue personal. And I learned that I was wrong to give her the benefit of the doubt because she told me I was not the first to inform her of the code and recommend removing the promotional display. She simply chose advertising a product that promotes poor health and disregarded the concerns of educated consumers.

She implied that I was a breastfeeding mother intent on forcing my choices on others, she argued "some women just don't want to breastfeed and they have a choice and I'm allowed to advertise what I want in my store, except for cigarettes". I informed her that
this is not a matter of choice it is a matter of health. Furthermore the danger ABM poses to the health is comparable to the danger cigarettes pose to health. But babies don't smoke, adults do. Adults don't drink ABM.

Moreover, I question how much the store manager turly values so-called choice, given that she had two large displays promoting feeding babies an inferior man-made artificial and dead substance and yet no equivalent promotion of feeding babies the superior, normal, natural, organic, living milk of mothers' breasts. Well, it hardly takes a genius to figure out why that is the case; breastfeeding doesn't make the store manager money!


Attitudes towards birth provide another example of how little this society values the importance of infant health. Scientifically we know that giving birth under the influence of narcotics, such as pethidine, compromises the health of unborn and newborn babies. Medical evidence supports the safety of homebirth and the danger of caesarean sections. Yet, almost 100% of Australian babies are born in hospitals where only 1-5% of babies escape these interventions (and more). And educated folks who share this information with others are accused of not respecting the choices of women who prefer to make birth choices which compromise the health of their babies and themselves.

Of course another glaringly obvious way our society refuses to acknowledge the humanity of babies is male infant genital mutilation. Our society refers to this abhorrent abuse of human rights politely as "circumscision". It is in fact the unnecessary and permenant mutilation of a baby boy's penis which poses health risks to him for life, including the potential for castration. Some people may point out that such a risk is low, but when you take into account that in this age; with awareness about hygeine, where there is rarely to never a medical justification for genital mutilation, and is almost always carried out for cosmetic reasons, facing such a risk, no matter how low, is ridiculous and sickening.


Just like birth and breastfeeding, the concept of choice gets thrown around when it comes to chopping up baby boy's penises. It's a parents' choice to mutilate their son's penis. It's a parents 'choice to give their babies a drugged start to life or increase their babies risk of death three fold by surgically removing baby from mother's womb. It's a parents' choice to compromise their babies immune systems, digestive systems, increase their risk of malnutrition, contimination and obesity in future life (to name just a few health consequences of ABM).
Where, in all this, is the baby's choice?

Babies are people too. It is dispicable that so many babies are artificially fed, and almost 100% of those babies do not need ABM to survive. It is because ABM companies and stores profit from the sale of artificial infant milk that feeding a baby normal milk (which is their birthrite) has become one of two "choices". It is this easy access and insidious advertising of ABM that undermines a mother's breastfeeding journey and makes it easy for parents to deny their children breast milk.

Furthermore artificial infant formual does not need advertising! If a baby has a genuine medical need to eat something other than breast milk, then his or her parents can go in search of such a product (I was going to write "just as parents of a child with a gluten or lactose intolerance search for gluten and lactose free foods for their children", but that is an unfair comparison given that it is much harder to find gluten and lactose free products than it is to find artificial infant milk and yet there is a legitimate and widespread need for easy access to gluten and lactose free foods!). Promoting artificial feeding is more aptly compared to promoting artificial breathing products - IT DOESN'T NEED PROMOTING! We know it's needed in dire circumstances, and we'll get back to you if we suddenly struggle to breathe!

Breastfeeding is not a parent's choice! Breastfeeding is a baby's health requirement!

Bookmark and Share

For information about the importance of breastfeeding and dangers of artificial breast milk read:


101 Reasons to Breastfeed Your Child

Artificial Feeding – Nothing To Do With Breastfeeding

Consumer Research on Infant Formual and Infant Feeding

Formula for Disaster

Genetic Engineering and Infant Foods

Hot Milk - The Unbottled Truth About Formula

IBFAN

International Breastfeeding Journal

Just One Bottle

Misinformation: Redefining Baby Feeding

Myths

Suck on This

Toxic Phthalates in Infant Formulas


The Case of The Virgin Gut

The Language of Breastfeeding

The Risks of Infant Formula Feeding

What Should I Know About Infant Formula

Yes! Just One Bottle Will Hurt!


For related articles at Ilithyia Inspired:

Those Not Breastfeeding Yet, Need Breastfeeding Support

The Personal is Political For Everyone But Me

Uncovering What Lies Behind Lactophobia

Breastfeeding Beyond Two Years

© 2007 - 2010 Sarah Langford - Ilithyia Inspired | No reproduction without docmentation of permission from blog author and/or providing full bibliographic details including a link to the exact page quoted.

All opinions expressed on Ilithyia Inspired belong to the author, unless otherwise stated and should not be confused with the official views of any of the organisations with which the author is associated, including but not limited to: Australian Breastfeeding Association, International College of Spiritual Midwifery, and Maternity Coalition.

All the opinions expressed on this site are the author's, unless otherwise stated, and are independent from the Australian Breastfeeding Association and International College of Spiritual Midwifery | Any information provided on this site should be used as an introduction to ideas that hopefully inspire further research and education elsewhere. Information and opinions provided on this site should not used in place of professional medical advice.

  © Blogger template 'Personal Blog' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP